*Losing Yourself in a Fictional Character Can Affect Your Real Life*
Published on Psych Central
News|
shared via feedly
mobile

[image: Losing Yourself in a Fictional Character Can Affect Your Real
Life]People
who lose themselves inside the world of a fictional character may actually
change their own behavior and thoughts to match those of that character,
according to new research.

Researchers at Ohio State University examined what happened to people who,
while reading a fictional story, found themselves feeling the emotions,
thoughts, and beliefs of one of the characters as if they were their own, a
phenomenon researchers call “experience-taking.”

The researchers found that, in the right situations, experience-taking may
lead to real changes, if only temporary, in readers’ lives.

For example, in one experiment, the researchers found that people who
strongly identified with a fictional character who overcame obstacles to
vote were significantly more likely to vote in a real election several days
later.

In another experiment, people who went through the experience-taking
process while reading about a character who was revealed to be of a
different race or sexual orientation showed more favorable attitudes toward
the other group and were less likely to stereotype.

“Experience-taking can be a powerful way to change our behavior and
thoughts in meaningful and beneficial ways,” said Lisa Libby, co-author of
the study and assistant professor of psychology at Ohio State University.

“Experience-taking changes us by allowing us to merge our own lives with
those of the characters we read about, which can lead to good outcomes,”
added Geoff Kaufman, who led the study as a graduate student at Ohio State
and is now a postdoctoral researcher at the Tiltfactor Laboratory at
Dartmouth College.

Experience-taking doesn’t happen to all readers, he said, noting it only
occurs when people are able to forget about themselves. The researchers
found that most college students were unable to undergo experience-taking
if they were reading in a cubicle with a mirror.

“The more you’re reminded of your own personal identity, the less likely
you’ll be able to take on a character’s identity,” Kaufman said. “You have
to be able to take yourself out of the picture, and really lose yourself in
the book in order to have this authentic experience of taking on a
character’s identity.”

In the voting study, 82 undergraduates who were registered to vote were
assigned to read one of four versions of a short story about a student
enduring several obstacles, such as car problems, rain and long lines, on
the morning of Election Day before ultimately entering the booth to cast a
vote. This experiment took place several days before the November 2008
presidential election.

Some versions were written in first person (“I entered the voting booth)
while some were written in third person (“Paul entered the voting booth”).
In addition, some versions featured a student who attended the same
university as the participants, while in other versions, the person
attended a different university.

The results showed that students who read a story told in first-person
about a student at their own university had the highest level of
experience-taking. About 65 percent reported they voted when they were
asked later. In comparison, only 29 percent of the students voted if they
read the first-person story about a student from a different university.

“When you share a group membership with a character from a story told in
first-person voice, you’re much more likely to feel like you’re
experiencing his or her life events,” Libby said. “When you undergo this
experience-taking, it can affect your behavior for days afterwards.”

But what if the character is not similar to the reader?

The researchers conducted another experiment in which 70 male, heterosexual
college students read a story about a day in the life of another student.
There were three versions: One in which the character was revealed to be
gay early in the story, one in which the student was identified as gay late
in the story, and one in which the character was heterosexual.

Results showed that the students who read the story where the character was
identified as gay late in the story reported higher levels of
experience-taking than those who read the story where the character’s
homosexuality was discovered early on.

“If participants knew early on that the character was not like them — that
he was gay — that prevented them from really experience-taking,” Libby
said. “But if they learned late about the character’s homosexuality, they
were just as likely to lose themselves in the character as were the people
who read about a heterosexual student.”

The version of the story participants read also affected how they thought
about gay people, he said.

Those who read the gay-late narrative reported significantly more favorable
attitudes toward homosexuals after reading the story than readers of the
gay-early narrative and the heterosexual narrative.

Those who read the gay-late narrative also relied less on stereotypes of
homosexuals, rating the gay character as less feminine and less emotional
than the readers of the gay-early story.

Similar results were found in a story where white students read about a
black student, who was identified as black early or late in the story.

Libby said experience-taking is different from perspective-taking, where
people try to understand what another person is going through without
losing sight of their own identity.

“Experience-taking is much more immersive — you’ve replaced yourself with
the other,” she said.

The key is that experience-taking happens naturally, she
added. “Experience-taking can be very powerful because people don’t even
realize it is happening to them,” she said. “It is an unconscious process.”

The study, which appears in the *Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology,* was funded by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research
Fellowship to Kaufman.

Source: Ohio State University »>

http://drgrady.tumblr.com/post/22845361417

Advertisements